In 2002, twice as many 21-year-olds as 18-year-olds were involved in alcohol related traffic fatalities.
This entry was posted
on Monday, May 21st, 2012 at 5:36 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The drinking age is not effective in making sure that young people don’t abuse alcohol. Making sure that young people treat alcohol as a drink and not as an illegal drug would be a significant difference. If the drinking age were 18 and there were related laws to make sure that alcohol would not be abused in any situation, alcohol related traffic fatalities would decrease. The failure to teach people who are 18-20 the importance of responsibility sets up the condition for where drunk driving would be higher than if Choose Responsibilty’s program were to be enacted. Stopping the conditions for drunk driving is important and should be pursued but no cliff-hanger, a high drinking age, is part of any solution.
May 21st, 2012 at 9:42 pm
The drinking age is not effective in making sure that young people don’t abuse alcohol. Making sure that young people treat alcohol as a drink and not as an illegal drug would be a significant difference. If the drinking age were 18 and there were related laws to make sure that alcohol would not be abused in any situation, alcohol related traffic fatalities would decrease. The failure to teach people who are 18-20 the importance of responsibility sets up the condition for where drunk driving would be higher than if Choose Responsibilty’s program were to be enacted. Stopping the conditions for drunk driving is important and should be pursued but no cliff-hanger, a high drinking age, is part of any solution.